This comes as no surprise to veteran observers. To have even admitted the possibility of another side to the capital H 'Holocaust' would undermine far more than the Zionist enterprise in Palestine. It would undermine the legitimacy of every allied government that fought World War II; it would undermine the legitimacy of the current ZOG of Germany and also undermine the legitimacy of the United Nations. To have expected any different court outcome flew in the face of all logic, of all political street smarts and of all common sense. The previous western civilization committed final suicide in 1939-46 when it fought the Second War To Kill White People. It merely started the funerary rites when it subsequently suspended all its long developed rules of jurisprudence and evidence at the Nuremburg International Military Tribunal. Now after the accumulation like geological strata of decades of precedent, all citing the same Stalinist show trial outcome of the I.M.T. in 1946, no British judge in Brit-ZOG Y2K is going to swim against that tide.
So what comes next? Next up is most likely
bankruptcy for David Irving unless (and I pray one doesn't appear) yet
another sap is found who will bankroll Irving's 2.x million quid court costs owed to Lipstadt and Penguin. In the course of these proceedings it's conceivable a bankruptcy court will assign Irving's book copyrights to his creditors. In this instance these are agencies of ZOG. I therefore strongly urge all with any interest whatever to immediately begin downloading Irving's online PDF book versions here: http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/index.html It's totally possible that in few weeks or months they will literally disappear down the memory hole. If you have an interest in the printed volume ii of his Churchill memoirs don't delay, order today.
How did all this come about? In four words: ego, greed, narcissism and respectabilities. All of them David Irving's. It began with his massive ego and narcissism that needed constant stroking by way of the klieg lights, the media glare and seeing his image in the newspapers and on the tube weekly. It continued with greed, Irving's greed for the big dollars that come from publication through the ZOG presses and the jet set Mayfair lifestyle those dollars make possible. It reached its fullness with a bad case of respectabilities. Again these lie in David Irving's perverse expectation that an international social system founded on certain premises would ever accord him a respectful hearing when he preached against the foundational assumptions of those premises.
Along the way David Irving indeed committed a final, lasting 'defaming the memory of the dead'. It was not against Jews, however. The author of "Nuremburg: The Final Battle" committed it against over a hundred men judicially lynched by the Nuremburg International Military Tribunal. These men, whatever else they did or didn't do, had been fighting YOUR (assuming you are a white person) war against Asia. They weren't tried in the sense of crimes being proven before a jury. They were merely arraigned, arrayed, reviled, ridiculed and handed foreordained sentences like any of the other Stalinist show trial victims. They were simply frog marched in front of what the then Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court described as 'a high grade lynching party'.
Forty-five years later David Irving lost an historic opportunity to finally allow these men to have their day before a British jury. He, the author of "Nuremburg: The Final Battle", declined to try the case in front of a jury. Instead David Irving agreed with their and his enemies that the matter was too complicated for a jury of citizens. For this reason alone I have not one whit of sympathy for him now. Instead David Irving wanted to again be one of the inside "big boys", a cut above us commoners. So he continued to perversely play the role of the gallant English gentlemen with opponents that he knows will stop at nothing to get their way.
David also declined to be a team player and make use of many other resources, such as Germar Rudolf, a trained scientist whose chemical analysis of Auschwitz stands far above the incomplete Leuchter Report. He declined to make any use at all of specialists such as professional engineers and chemists. One result of this one man circus was to allow the fraudulently self-styled architect who is not, Robert Jan Van Pelt, to offer into expert evidence the assertion that it's possible to cremate multiple corpses with as little as 3.5 kilograms (7.7 lbs.) of industrial coke. But you see, this was David Irving's solo return to the media limelight. It was not to be shared with other lesser lights even if they possessed greater specialist subject matter expertise.
Well now it's over. There are big price tags to be paid, not only by David Irving but by prisoners whose convictions under 'denial' laws are now made to seem more reasonable by Theatre of the Talmudically Absurd, David Irving so obligingly helped stage. If he ever finds the time to write any further books, there might be something worth looking into. But until then...
Auf Wiedersehen, Herr Irving!