COUNTER DISSONANCE is a tactic used by a corrupt and inefficient government to discredit its opponents when it is unable to defeat them in open battle or with the usual campaigns of suppression involving mass arrests and the like. It is usually brought into action when the regime's opposition can no longer be ignored and when the opponents have obtained favorable publicity through 'propaganda of the deed', such as the freeing of political prisoners, the seizing of military supplies, etc. The government is obviously unable to guard effectively ALL important targets which the opposition may wish to strike, nor can it ferret out or otherwise neutralize the opposition activists who are doing the damage. Resources are clearly limited. The regime cannot draft everyone into the armed forces nor can it afford to maintain the existing forces on combat-ready standby for an indefinite period of time, to be determined by the regime's opponents. The fat backsides of the Jews' satraps squirm uncomfortably upon the horns of a dilemma.
Counter dissonance is one means available with which to solve the problem presented by the opposition. The government sends its own agents into the field, disguised or identifiable as members of the opposition. These agents commit hideous acts of terror and violence against the general civilian population – in the name of the opposition. The atrocities are publicized in a manner favorable to the government and the people will begin to waver in their support for the opposition. They may even deny their support and work against the opposition by betraying its members to government forces, for suitable rewards, of course. The people will think, "The government is certainly corrupt and inefficient, but at least it is not vicious, like its mad-dog opponents." When the people begin to think this, they become lost to their own salvation and the defeat of their would-be rescuers is only a matter of time. The positive programs of the opposition are forgotten and INERTIA, that ultimate foundation of all governments, reasserts itself. The government, such as it is, has won.
The Jews, those two-legged chameleons, are expert at such duplicity. In Poland, their massacres of German residents were blamed on the Poles. In the Ukraine, their vicious atrocities against the German soldiery were blamed upon the Ukrainians and vice versa. Dressed in German uniforms, these same Jewish murder squads committed atrocities sufficiently heinous and grotesque that they were able to destroy White unity and influenced many White people in the Soviet satellites to support the Jewish commissariat.
In more recent times, Israel has similarly used its bandit formations to attack U.S. installations and vessels in or near Arab countries, hoping to affix the blame for these cowardly assaults upon the Jews' enemies, as in the Lavon and LIBERTY affairs. Strange as it may seem to majority Americans, these attacks, had they been blamed upon the Arabs, would have been cause for the United States to declare war, but as they were discovered to have been Jewish in origin, they were quickly consigned to journalistic and diplomatic oblivion by the American powers-that-be. White Americans should no longer be in doubt that their rulers are the Jews. How much longer can we afford to distort our view of reality with the rose-colored lenses of wishful-thinking, that it just isn't so?
The United States, under Jewish domination, performed similar atrocities in South America and in Vietnam and thus has gathered sufficient data to enable it to orchestrate such terrorist programs to a fine pitch, allowing for racial/cultural variables. It is reasonable to add that it took the Southeast Asians approximately 1000 years to hate their Chinese rulers and finally overthrow them. The U.S., being in the jet age, took little more than 16 years to achieve the same dismal result.
Counter dissonance is the product of tax-payer supported think-tanks of the Herman Kahn variety – air-conditioned meeting places of the Jewish Kehillah. The awkward-sounding term stems from the mumbo-jumbo jargon of the high priests of computer/systems analysis, but in plain, White man's language it simply means that one drowns out a noise by making a bigger noise. Let us be alert to the sound of this Zionist 'music'.
PHONY COMBAT CELLS will be brought into play as the revolutionary White Nationalist struggle intensifies, because it will soon become apparent that a growing number of White activists will desire to combat the armed occupation forces with armed resistance. The occupation authorities will oblige by setting up and publicizing certain 'opposition' combat cells, complete with weapons. Such combat formations may even take part in attacks upon occupation forces and installations, but these attacks will be strictly limited in their effects so as to leave unimpaired the economic infrastructure.
Once the bag of activist recruits is deemed sufficient, the draw-strings are pulled and... "Government forces today are reported to have surrounded a 'terrorist' stronghold, killing or capturing all of the criminal elements involved, except for self-styled terrorist 'Commander' X who escaped the law enforcement net only by an exceptional stroke of 'good fortune'..."
DANGER SIGNALS FOR THE VALIANT: Both ploys and their variations can be readily identified in regard to the selection of targets. The targets chosen by government agents WILL NOT affect the economic means of production and distribution (the economic infrastructure), for the impairment and disruption of these targets USUALLY produce the revolutionary mass upheavals which the occupation authorities do not want. Thus, targets will be attacked so as to cause 'noise' rather than damage, even when large numbers of human lives are lost. The results of such calculated misapplication of force will be the isolation of the revolutionary group from its popular support and the acquisition of a 'mad-dog' image for the revolutionary movement as a whole. With any luck at all, such atrocities will lead to bickering amongst the opposition groups and even internecine warfare.
If there remains any doubt about target selection in a national liberation struggle, it should be pointed out that the London Blitz and the mad-bomber's delights – Hamburg and Dresden – killed off more people in a few hours than all the anarchist bombings in history. Yet, none of these attacks had the desired effect of destroying the national war effort – quite the contrary! In the case of England, attacks on the civilian sectors drew off pressure on England's all-important fighter bases. In the case of Germany, war production figures showed a noticeable increase in the Hamburg area soon after the raid, as civilian industry had largely been destroyed, thus freeing the survivors of the holocaust for work in the neighboring defense plants. The holocaust of Dresden was unparalleled in the annals of atrocity, but the only military result achieved was beneficial to Germany's war effort. The millions of refugees who had crowded into the defenseless and non-strategic city no longer had to be fed and sheltered and most important, the fire-bombings halted to a large extent the spread of the deadly typhus disease in the area.
As for the atomic bombs on Japan, they merely provided the Japanese Imperial Government with a good excuse to surrender, as the Japanese high command realized that Japan had already been defeated by conventional means. Their previously-admitted defeat was evidenced by the diplomatic 'peace-feelers' which the Japanese Government had been sending out a whole year before the atomic destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
In other words human targets are rarely productive of a revolutionary situation, but material targets usually are! Destruction of the MEANS of human life rather than the destruction of human life itself generally results in revolutionary collapse, as in the cases of World War I Russia and Germany. Imagine, for example, the results of a delay in welfare checks, a halt in a key means of transportation or a sudden curtailment of electrical power. Compare such possibilities with the results obtainable from the assassination of even one big-name enemy or even hundreds of racial enemies. Thus may you separate the real revolutionaries, the real White Nationalists from the COINTELPRO agent-provocateurs.
(Mr. Thomson makes a poignant observation. Thus, in light of the fact that the N.Y.C. Trade Tower bombing had no effect upon the economic infra structure, we can conclude that it was a Zionist orchestrated operation with Arab players. Likewise for the Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing which had no strategic value other than lending a credence to the Clinton/Reno babble. Our elected commies shed crocodile tears over the children killed in Oklahoma City, but nary a tear was seen relative to the two-dozen children burned alive at Waco. We should never neglect: CUI BONO – for whose benefit? Ed.)