First Amendment Exercise Machine
Congress shall make no law...
Our Race Is Our Nation ...
DOwn With ZOG! Anti Zionist Alliance
Refresh or click here to display a random Adlib page.
And now a nature story –
We saw a Jewish seagull at a beach park yesterday. How, you may rightly ask, could we tell it was a Jewish seagull? Well, sit back and relax....
There was a flock of about 30 seagulls gathered around a drinking fountain with a leaky faucet. In the center, keeping control of the puddle, was one old loudmouth seagull cackling away. Whenever any of the other seagulls tried to come up to get a drink, this seagull would charge and peck the other away. And all the time, whether other seagulls tried to drink or not, the drinking fountain seagull continued his cackling and croaking, making more noise than all the rest of the seagulls put together.
After one particular incident chasing another seagull away from the fresh water, the whole flock started a small riot, all the seagulls moving around, cackling a bit and several pecking others who weren't even involved. But that soon calmed down, except for our one seagull, who continued his cackling non-stop. Probably he was cackling about the 'Holocackle' that had just happened.
The saddest part was when I realized that whenever the flock moved, the old selfish seagull, instead of keeping his precious water fountain, would go away with the rest.
A Jewish seagull beyond all doubt.
Ralph the Leninist by Jacob Weisberg
Posted Tuesday, Oct. 31, 2000, at 5:13 p.m. PT
Over the past 10 days, liberals have been voicing shock and dismay at the imminent prospect of their old hero, Ralph Nader, intentionally throwing the election to George W. Bush. A first, eloquent protest came 10 days ago from a group of a dozen former "Nader's Raiders," who asserted that their former mentor had broken a promise not to campaign in states where he could hurt Gore and begged him to reconsider doing so. Others, including Newsweek columnist Jonathan Alter, have expressed a similar sense of disappointment and betrayal.
Nader's response to all this heartfelt hand-wringing has been to scoff and sneer. On Good Morning America, he referred contemptuously to his old disciples as "frightened liberals." The Green Party nominee is spending the final week of the campaign stumping in Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Oregon, and Washington – the very states where a strong showing stands to hurt Gore the most. Nader has said he wants to maximize his vote in every state in hopes of attaining the 5 percent of the vote that will qualify the Green Party for $12 million in federal matching funds in 2004. Speaking to foreign journalists in Washington yesterday, he explicitly rejected Internet vote-swapping schemes that could help him reach this qualifying threshold without the side effect of electing Bush president. In various other TV appearances, Nader has stated bluntly that he couldn't care less who wins.
This depraved indifference to Republican rule has made Nader's old liberal friends even more furious. A bunch of intellectuals organized by Sean Wilentz and Todd Gitlin are circulating a much nastier open letter, denouncing Nader's "wrecking-ball campaign – one that betrays the very liberal and progressive values it claims to uphold." But really, the question shouldn't be the one liberals seem to be asking about why Nader is doing what he's doing. The question should be why anyone is surprised. For some time now, Nader has made it perfectly clear that his campaign isn't about trying to pull the Democrats back to the left. Rather, his strategy is the Leninist one of "heightening the contradictions." It's not just that Nader is willing to take a chance of being personally responsible for electing Bush. It's that he's actively trying to elect Bush because he thinks that social conditions in American need to get worse before they can better.
Nader often makes this "the worse, the better" point on the stump in relation to Republicans and the environment. He says that Reagan-era Interior Secretary James Watt was useful because he was a "provocateur" for change, noting that Watt spurred a massive boost in the Sierra Club's membership. More recently, Nader applied the same logic to Bush himself. Here's the Los Angeles Times' account of a speech Nader gave at Chapman University in Orange, Calif., last week: "After lambasting Gore as part of a do-nothing Clinton administration, Nader said, 'If it were a choice between a provocateur and an anesthetizer, I'd rather have a provocateur. It would mobilize us.' "
Lest this remark be considered an aberration, Nader has said similar things before. "When [the Democrats] lose, they say it's because they are not appealing to the Republican voters," Nader told an audience in Madison, Wis., a few months ago, according to a story in The Nation. "We want them to say they lost because a progressive movement took away votes." That might make it sound like Nader's goal is to defeat Gore in order to shift the Democratic Party to the left. But in a more recent interview with David Moberg in the socialist paper In These Times, Nader made it clear that his real mission is to destroy and then replace the Democratic Party altogether. According to Moberg, Nader talked "about leading the Greens into a 'death struggle' with the Democratic Party to determine which will be the majority party." Nader further and shockingly explained that he hopes in the future to run Green Party candidates around the country, including against such progressive Democrats as Sen. Paul Wellstone of Minnesota, Sen. Senator Russell Feingold of Wisconsin, and Rep. Henry Waxman of California. "I hate to use military analogies," Nader said, "but this is war on the two parties."
Hitler analogies always lead to trouble, but the one here is irresistible since Nader is actually making the argument of the German Communist Party circa 1932, which helped bring the Nazis to power. I'm not comparing the Republicans to fascists or the Greens to Stalinists for that matter. But Nader and his supporters are emulating a disturbing, familiar pattern of sectarian idiocy. You hear these echoes whenever Nader criticizes Bush halfheartedly, then becomes enthusiastic and animated blasting the Green version of the "social fascists" – Bill Clinton, Gore, and moderate environmentalists. It's clear that the people he really despises are those who half agree with him. To Nader, it is liberal meliorists, not right-wing conservatives, who are the true enemies of his effort to build a "genuine" progressive movement. He does have a preference between Republicans and Democrats, and it's for the party that he thinks will inflict maximum damage on the environment, civil rights, labor rights, and so on. By assisting his class enemy, Nader thinks he can help pull the wool from the eyes of a sheeplike public.
If Nader's goal were actually progressive reform – a ban on soft money, a higher minimum wage, health-care coverage for some of the uninsured, a global warming treaty – it would be possible to say that his strategy was breathtakingly stupid. But Nader's goal is not progressive reform; it's a transformation in human consciousness. His Green Party will not flourish under Democratic presidents who lull the country into a sense of complacency by making things moderately better. If it is to thrive, it needs villainous, right-wing Republicans who will make things worse. Like Pat Buchanan, Nader understands that his movement thrives on misery. But the comparison is actually unfair to Buchanan (words I never thought I'd write) because Buchanan doesn't work to create more misery for the sake of making his movement grow the way Nader does. From a strictly self-interested point of view, Nader's stance is the more rational one.
So Gore supporters might as well quit warning the Green candidate that he's going to put George W. Bush in White House. Ralph Nader is a very intelligent man who knows exactly what's he doing. And they only seem to be encouraging him.
I personally like everyone from Zündel and Irving to Smith and beyond. If they ever asked for a favor, I'd more than likely comply. I criticize their modus operandi but this criticism is confined to the domain of opinion. My opinion is not offered because I wish to be interpreted as wise, or even prophetic, but to furnish seed for that in which the White man excels – thinking objectively. If all of my whooping and hollering has brought one White man to stop and say to himself, "I'll be damned. I never thought of that," then this effort will not have been in vain.
Yes Irene, the Grand Island kids are getting out of hand and now the adults are clamoring for a curfew. Curfews do not change any kids behavior. That behavior was instilled mainly in the household they were brought up. The only way negative behaviors can be altered is either by the individual voluntarily controlling what he does in line with what is acceptable, or by "making him an offer he cannot refuse". Making a choice between being shot or behaving is not a difficult one to make. But that's a no-no in today's effete society where hurting the feelings of another is tantamount to execution. No one must never be "offended". It's called "mental anguish" and heaven forbid anyone ever suffering from that!
The rot did not come over night but it's here in all its slimy putrescence. The White father is now denied his traditional authority in the home – by law. If he catches his wife in the sack getting serviced by the meter reader, he can do little of nothing other than count the strokes. (Keep in mind that it was SHE who spread her legs. The meter reader only took advantage of an opportunity.) If she gets splattered against the wall, as she SHOULD, he'd soon be in the can for assault. Even harsh words can be labeled "verbal abuse". It is doubly true of his children where "child abuse" is so broad in range that it often covers an angry look. Robbed of this authority, the house evolves in to little more than a hotel where everyone "does his own thing" and doing your thing is about as advantageous to social order as desertion is to the military. In this environment a man must be EXTREMELY careful as to whom he chooses to be the mother of his children. There are a lot of great looking vipers out there. MEN always choose WOMEN for their life partners. Wimps and other varieties of nincompoops always choose that which tickles their gonads. They enjoy their pleasurable moments before the ultimate, and inevitable, storm for a viper is compelled to sink its fangs into something, sometime.
I avoid the company of all non-Whites as best I can during an average day of living. I do not voluntarily contribute to anything which I believe to be detrimental to my race. I try to live and let live. I do not hate crocodiles nor even dislike them as long as them remain surfing in the Congo River. When they show up in my back yard, then I do get a little annoyed. If one tries to deprive me of my life or my welfare, then it's time for Mr. Colt. I like the Texas motto "Don't tread on me."
There is no way outside of a lobotomy which will ever get me to belittle White achievement with the effect of believing all humanoids "are equal". From cathedrals and science to literature and rockets, White people DO NOT have peers. Moreover, the runners-up are so far behind that it's not even worth considering. We are unique and I remain eternally proud to belong to that group. I am the first to admit that I am not a great specimen of the White race for there are thousands more intelligent, more physically robust, more handsome, more ethical, more moral and more everything, than I, but I remain a White man and I have a God-given duty to act like one. I can be nothing else and neither can the antelope or cheetah. I cannot act like a Negro anymore than a leopard can act like a lion for to do so would betray, and pervert, everything God set into motion. I, as an individual, can be bested in several ways by others of another race but there are White brothers out there who can best all of the other races. There is NO member of another race of whom we could not do without. WE NEED THEM NOT but they, sure as shootin', need us. They simply cannot compete and their only path to anything must be paved with our efforts and approval. That's why it is so essential for them to handicap us with self-imposed guilt, special priviledges for the botched, and promote disastrous out-breeding with those not of our kind. It's harder to behead a man when he is standing than it is when he is in the ass-kissing position. To be White is to remain standing with a deaf ear when the "minorities" start their weeping and wailing for it's only a disarming act they play.
Pee-rot, after the Zionist State of Israel, is the biggest single welfare queen this country has ever seen. His first company, Electronic Data Systems, made its bucks almost entirely on FEDZOG-USA government contracts, specifically computerizing the Social Security and IRS offices, with Pentagon deals along the way.
His deal with the Clintons went much deeper. At the same time he was running his divide the vote candidacy, he had also just started up another 'computer integrator' company on EDS' lines, this one specializing in medical management information systems. And boy, what an amazing coincidence! In their first major initiative (after trying to turn military barracks into open homosexual bathhouses), the Clintons tried to create a socialized national health care system. This, had it worked, would have made him the richest man in the world, more than likely. Just imagine all of Pee-rot's systems in every hospital, doctor's office, and drug store in the country, in addition to the all the work inside FED-ZOGUSA itself.
They paid Pee-rot back in other ways for all the money he so selflessly 'spent' on his candidacy, but there was the Big Tamale Pee-rot really wanted. The legend that Pee-rot spent his own money because he was patriotically concerned about the Jewess Ah!' is the biggest load of crap since the original Holoco$t. He doesn't give two craps (they can be sold for compost) about anyone except himself.
Won't it be great once we can see what deals our Kleptocracy has cut in advance over the current election farce?
Oh my stars Jim!!! What a great website!! I can't believe I hadn't come cross it before now. I should have heeded your advice long ago! My God, but those people give one a certain sense of hope, not to mention a sense of greater pride in not being born a minority! The one guy made such perfect sense too. I've thought to myself for some time that what goes around comes around and that it's only a matter of time before white people in America become the minority at which time those remaining will have nothing better to do than stay home and breed. Afterall it is the one pleasure that requires nothing more than a willing partner and it is the rich man who has no time for such simplicity.
Just the same though, it is very difficult to sit back and watch your world slip away without ever lifting a finger to hold on to it. I wonder what makes some of us able to recognize and repel the beast, while others are swept away by its siren. You know my son can sit in front of a television set and tell me every time he sees one of the subliminal cuts. I've caught a few myself, but I often wonder if it was only my imagination, having been in an almost dreamlike state. Sort of being almost but not quite asleep, then waking to wonder if there really was a commercial for 5 Star Ford or Wendys.
I'll talk to you more about this later. Gotta be in early tomorrow.
This is the home page of FAEM by Robert Frenz. It was a public journal before the term “web log” was invented. Since Frenz’s death in May 2003 this collection of over 1,200 pages is maintained by the Heretical Press, Yorkshire, England. Frenz’s pithy and perceptive commentary on events occurring between 2000 and 2003, combined with many illuminating anecdotes from his rich and varied life, gained him a keen audience. Though a chemist and mathematician Robert Frenz was above all a teacher, and he is missed by many.